The current push towards a technological decoupling – born of a desire to suppress competition and restrict choice – is at odds with the way that technology has boomed over the past 20 years.
When state-of-the-art tech is combined with globalisation, the benefits enjoyed by customers and organisations are substantial.
Technology thrives in a competitive, open world. It evolves best when not placed in a straitjacket, such as that imposed by national borders. It is no coincidence that two decades of openness have gone hand in hand with rapid innovation.
Since the Information Technology Agreement was signed in 1996, removing tariffs on 97 per cent of technology products, tech sector trade has quadrupled, access to the internet has boomed and the tech ecosystem has globalised, driven mainly by consumer demand in the US and Europe.
Suddenly, tackling the world’s biggest challenges seemed well within our grasp. The intent was there and, with healthy competition flourishing, investment in research and development quickly followed.
Like many global tech groups, Huawei enjoyed growth because of liberalised global market conditions and openness.
The company was quick to seize the opportunities and it has invested more than $73bn in research and development since 2010.
Other groups have done likewise, providing direct benefits to the countries in which they work, all around the world.
Innovation creates jobs, boosts gross domestic product and lifts living standards.
Recently, Huawei has borne the brunt of US hostility to globalisation, which has included allegations of secret subsidies.
Our supply chain adapted to this pressure, allowing us to continue serving our customers. Our investment in research and development, and work with commercial and academic partners, continues to create benefits for those nations committed to free trade and open markets.
Huawei believes in globalisation and open competition, a level playing field, the protection of intellectual property and non-discrimination. We also support a rules-based global trading system underpinned by the World Trade Organization.
If it is allowed to gather pace, anti-globalisation could result in competing systems, which in turn will reduce innovation. This would set back global connectivity and push up costs … and the biggest losers will be consumers.
Let us not jeopardise future benefits by pursuing forced fragmentation. Instead, let us collaborate on goals such as setting global rules for the new era of digital trade. Cooperation is the way we can unlock the full potential of innovation.